Regulated Electric · NYSE
Current Price
$72.20
Intrinsic Value
Use the calculator below to estimate
COMPETITIVE MOAT
↑Regulated Monopoly Service Territory
CMS Energy operates as a regulated electric utility, granting it a de facto monopoly within its defined service territories. This limits direct competition for essential energy services.
↑High Capital Intensity and Infrastructure Barriers
The extensive and costly infrastructure required for electricity generation, transmission, and distribution creates a significant barrier to entry for potential competitors. Building new grid infrastructure is prohibitively expensive.
↑Essential Service with Inelastic Demand
Electricity is a fundamental necessity for homes and businesses, resulting in relatively inelastic demand. Customers have few alternatives and are unlikely to switch providers for basic power needs.
INVESTMENT RISKS
↓Interest Rate Sensitivity and Debt Financing
Utilities are capital-intensive businesses that rely heavily on debt financing. Rising interest rates can significantly increase borrowing costs, impacting profitability and the affordability of new projects.
↓Extreme Weather Events and Infrastructure Resilience
CMS Energy's infrastructure is vulnerable to damage from increasingly frequent and severe weather events. Significant repair costs and service disruptions can arise from storms, impacting financial performance and customer satisfaction.
↓Transition to Renewable Energy and Grid Modernization
The shift towards renewable energy sources requires substantial investment in grid modernization and new technologies. CMS Energy faces the challenge of adapting its infrastructure and business model to accommodate these changes while ensuring reliability.
Adjust the growth rate, discount rate, and exit multiple to see how the intrinsic value and margin of safety for CMS Energy Corporation respond.
Open DCF Calculator for CMSCMS Energy Corporation operates as an energy company primarily in Michigan. The company operates through three segments: Electric Utility; Gas Utility; and NorthStar Clean Energy. The Electric Utility segment is involved in the generation, purchase, distribution, and sale of electricity. This segment generates electricity through coal, wind, gas, renewable energy, oil, and nuclear sources. Its distribution system comprises 263 miles of high-voltage distribution overhead lines; 4 miles of high-voltage distribution underground lines; 4,619 miles of high-voltage distribution overhead lines; 18 miles of high-voltage distribution underground lines; 82,854 miles of electric distribution overhead lines; 10,027 miles of underground distribution lines; and 1,102 substations. The Gas Utility segment engages in the purchase, transmission, storage, distribution, and sale of natural gas, which includes 2,337 miles of transmission lines; 14 gas storage fields; 28,433 miles of distribution mains; and 8 compressor stations. The NorthStar Clean Energy segment is involved in the independent power production and marketing, including the development and operation of renewable generation. The company serves 1.9 million electric and 1.8 million gas customers, including residential, commercial, and diversified industrial customers. The company was incorporated in 1987 and is headquartered in Jackson, Michigan.
Revenue/Share (TTM)
$29.32
FCF/Share (TTM)
$-6.35
ROIC (TTM)
3.4%
ROE (TTM)
11.0%
P/FCF
n/m
EV/EBITDA
13.4x
FCF Yield
-8.44%
Debt/Equity
1.97x
CMS currently has negative free cash flow, so cash-flow ratios such as P/FCF and FCF yield do not give a meaningful read on whether the stock is cheap or expensive. A DCF valuation is unreliable until cash generation turns positive — focus on the path to profitability instead.
CMS Energy Corporation currently generates $-6.35 in free cash flow per share. At the current price of $72.20, a DCF model would discount these cash flows at an appropriate WACC and apply a terminal growth rate to arrive at an intrinsic value. The result depends heavily on your growth and discount rate assumptions — a 1% change in WACC typically shifts the fair value estimate by 10-15%. In MiniValuator the model uses a single discount rate that you can edit directly, 10% by default, rather than a computed WACC.
CMS currently has negative free cash flow, so its P/FCF ratio is not meaningful and cannot tell you whether the stock is cheap or expensive. With cash flow negative, a DCF-based undervalued or overvalued judgment is unreliable — look at the path back to positive cash generation instead.
To perform a DCF valuation on CMS Energy Corporation: (1) Start with the trailing free cash flow per share ($-6.35) as the base, (2) project future FCF growth over 5-10 years based on Regulated Electric industry trends and company fundamentals, (3) apply a discount rate (WACC) reflecting CMS's risk profile — with a debt-to-equity of 1.97x, capital structure is an important factor, and (4) add a terminal value for cash flows beyond the projection period.
DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) estimates what a company is worth today based on its future cash generation. For CMS Energy Corporation, this means projecting how much free cash flow the company will produce over the next 5-10 years, shaped by Regulated Electric trends, then discounting those amounts to today's dollars. CMS's ROIC of 3.4% means the company's return on invested capital sits below the level that typically clears its cost of capital.
WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) is the discount rate in a DCF model — it reflects the minimum return investors require. For CMS, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.97x, the capital structure directly influences WACC. A 1% increase in WACC typically reduces the intrinsic value by 10-15%. At an EV/EBITDA of 13.4x, the market's implied discount rate can be reverse-engineered for comparison. In MiniValuator you set this discount rate yourself as a single editable number, 10% by default, instead of computing a formal WACC.
DCF and P/E value CMS with different methods and assumptions, so the two conclusions can differ. Compare the P/E fair value.
Price as of 2026-07-30. Financial data from Financial Modeling Prep (trailing twelve months) · Valuation methodology by Charlie Wang.
This is an estimate, not investment advice.